Hacker News
Validating your ideas on strangers (2017)
Aurornis
|next
[-]
Like most of the hustle culture writing, it's based on a single experience that may or may not have actually happened: The author approached someone in a bar and had a conversation, and now they're preaching this method as some groundbreaking business technique.
Cold approaches like this are not, in my opinion, a good idea if you want valid feedback. When you approach random people in a bar and interrupt them with some request, many people will go into defensive mode where they try to tell you what you want to hear to de-escalate and get you to go away.
Note their reaction:
> Their reaction was notably disturbed!
The author noticed they didn't appreciate his question but pressed on anyway, demanding they give him some feedback. Many people will play along for a few minutes and try to deliver something that fulfills the request and lets them get away from the situation.
That doesn't mean it's good advice. Like most hustle culture writing pieces, I don't think this advice to go to bars and interrupt random people and demand their feedback is a good idea.
thw_9a83c
|root
|parent
|next
[-]
I have a clear impression that you can't get much reasonable feedback this way. Most people just don't know what you're talking about and will either support or dismiss your idea without knowing anything about the topic. They mostly react based on likeness to previous discussions or on a human likability level. Getting feedback this way has never worked for me.
Aurornis
|root
|parent
[-]
Bringing up a business idea as a conversation topic after getting to know someone over beers is one thing.
This blog post isn't about that, though. It's about ambushing people at a bar and demanding they review your startup idea.
sublinear
|root
|parent
|previous
[-]
Since so many of the comments on here have been exceedingly negative and pearl-clutching...
Given the context of the typical user of this idea, buy them a shot each for their opinions later at night. You'll get a ton of feedback. It won't be coherent, but maybe it doesn't matter. What was the point of this idea again?
Aurornis
|root
|parent
[-]
It's not "pearl clutching" to explain why the feedback you get from this method isn't going to be helpful.
Annoying your focus group and intruding upon their night out isn't the way to get valid advice. It's how you get "please go away" advice when they start telling you anything to de-escalate and finish the task so they can get on with their night
> It won't be coherent, but maybe it doesn't matter.
I don't understand why people are fixated on the idea of gathering user feedback at a bar, even when they admit it's not going to be good advice.
What's even the point of this exercise? Why go to lengths to extract feedback from bar goers if you don't think it matters?
sublinear
|root
|parent
[-]
> Why go to lengths to extract feedback from bar goers if you don't think it matters?
We say this place isn't becoming reddit but man is this the ultimate moment to say "woosh"!
chacham15
|next
|previous
[-]
whycombinetor
|next
|previous
[-]
liqilin1567
|next
|previous
[-]
politelemon
|next
|previous
[-]
Please don't do what this post says. As someone at a bar I would appreciate you leaving me alone without me having to assert my right to a private conversation.
Lerc
|next
|previous
[-]
A single instance is not a bad thing, but once it becomes a repeated occuance it is terrible.
With this particular case, the threshold is likely to be in expectation. If you approach people and any of them are aware of this concept in advance, they might feel used. If they know what you are going to do before you start talking then the entire atmosphere has already been polluted.
It might be easier to think of it in ecological terms. Sustainability and limiting harms mark the core of what should govern human endeavours. If the bar was considered an ecological environment, the harm would be in negatively impacting the enjoyment of customers. A single query from a stranger might do no harm. It might even enrich their evening experience. Done unsustainably however, results in a progressive reduction in the quality of experience across the ecosystem.
saulpw
|root
|parent
|next
[-]
Aurornis
|root
|parent
|previous
[-]
It's worse than that. It's interrupting people who are trying to enjoy their night out and demanding they review your homework for you.
If people don't flat out tell you to go away, they're going to try to make up something simple as quick as possible to fulfill your task in the hopes that it will make you leave them alone.
tunesmith
|next
|previous
[-]
pavel_lishin
|next
|previous
[-]
zkmon
|next
|previous
[-]
petalmind
|next
|previous
[-]
neilv
|next
|previous
[-]
Because you interrupted their social outing with techbro baggery, including being kinda disingenuous about "a pitch coming up".
> Focus grouping. The only real difference is it is FREE.
A non-consensual focus group, in a venue where people are going partly to get away from biz BS they have to tolerate during the workday.
But if you're going to do it anyway, there is a convention in bars, of offering to buy a person a drink. Especially when it's an ambitious approach. No longer FREE.
willguest
|next
|previous
[-]
vntok
|next
|previous
[-]
sublinear
|next
|previous
[-]
I can only speak from my own experience that both the tech scene and bar scene have changed dramatically.
bloodyplonker22
|next
|previous
[-]
jll29
|previous
[-]
Also consider that disclosing your work in public means subsequent attempts to patent anything are toast (unless each stranger signs you an NDA first).
pavel_lishin
|root
|parent
[-]
Are you suggesting that people trying to have a drink are going to rush out and patent something based on what some asshole was trying to drunkenly describe to them?