Hacker News
The IBM Granite 4.1 family of models
85 points by wglb
ago
|
16 comments
DonHopkins
|next
[-]
They should go all in on AI first and rebrand as AIBM, it has a nice ring to it.
"IBM, UBM, we all BM for IBM." --David Gerrold, "When HARLIE Was One".
jrgd
|next
|previous
[-]
The few tests i ran i just got Granite4.1 tell me about YOLO repeatedly for no reasons; every questions and prompts were answered with a mention of a vision system unrelated with the task…
RickHull
|next
|previous
[-]
What is an enterprise workload?
reliablereason
|root
|parent
|next
[-]
Pragmatically enterprise tends to mean less refined, designed by committee and expensive.
In this case i would guess it is mostly a justification for taking a part of the LLM pie.
Havoc
|root
|parent
|next
|previous
[-]
Aside from this just being standard corporate speak copy, there is an element of truth there - the granite models are likely to give you more plain toneless responses rather than a rainbow of emojiis. Which in corporate setting can be useful
skiing_crawling
|root
|parent
|next
[-]
That actually sounds nice in theory. A model for getting work done and nothing else, which doesn't have to account or be trained for any type of user engagement. Like how chatgpt/claude are wasting their capacity on social niceties and glazing the user. I don't know if granite is one such but I'd bet that many of the other popular models can't be since they are consumer facing.
trilogic
|next
|previous
[-]
Here the most relevant models: https://hugston.com/models/granite-41-8bq4-k-m and: https://hugston.com/models/granite-41-30bq4-k-m