Hacker News
MCP 2026-07-28 Specification: transport going stateless
btbuilder
|next
[-]
ilc
|next
|previous
[-]
My only question is how do you handle channels in the architecture now. From what I saw in Claude Code, shifting to a totally http world has some timeout issues if a server drops out and comes back. Because of that I'm stuck writing stubs for my internal use MCP, this is fine for me, but if you are cleaning up semantics: Understanding how we expect clients to act around failure would really help, the story.
flowofcontrol
|next
|previous
[-]
hangrybear666
|next
|previous
[-]
osinix
|next
|previous
[-]
dend
|next
|previous
[-]
checker
|root
|parent
|next
[-]
dan-kwiat
|root
|parent
|next
|previous
[-]
dend
|root
|parent
[-]
Oras
|root
|parent
|previous
[-]
What’s the best practice for tools where the upstream API only supports basic auth (username/password) and there’s no OBO option? In my case the login returns a token that’s only valid for an hour, so the user has to re-auth after that. Do you stash the credentials on the MCP server and silently refresh, or is there a nicer pattern people are using?
firasd
|next
|previous
[-]
And even on the server side statefulness is very iffy anyway. How long are you going to hold something in RAM from a client and how long will you hold the connection open
varmabudharaju
|next
|previous
[-]
djhworld
|previous
[-]
e.g. mymcpserver.com/tools/call?mcp-method=search