Hacker News
ESP32-C3 SuperMini antenna modification
bArray
|next
[-]
> The two parts of the antenna are intentionally designed to create an omnidirectional radiation pattern without a pronounced directionality.
I worked on a project a while back to try to utilize this to detect the arrival direction of WiFi signals approximately based on received strength. Do this for enough base stations and you have a very crude positioning system.
TGower
|root
|parent
|next
[-]
Joel_Mckay
|root
|parent
|previous
[-]
Remember the rules limits use the ERP, and EEs may have added a crappy antenna on purpose to meet the legal limits.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_radiated_power
There are also medical radiofrequency exposure guidelines, and they mitigate deep tissue burns or "G5 Mind control beams" concerns. lol =3
https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/health-risks...
vkdelta
|root
|parent
|next
[-]
Engineer might be messing with other 2.4GHz devices by doing this
dgacmu
|root
|parent
|next
[-]
The radios on these are weak and adding an Omni antenna is exceptionally unlikely to violate EIRP.
Could this design accidentally radiate something it's picking up from the board outside of 2.4ghz? Sure.
But practically it's quite unlikely to in this context.
spacedoutman
|root
|parent
|previous
[-]
They are completely toothless.
chemeril
|root
|parent
|next
[-]
bikezen
|root
|parent
|next
|previous
[-]
Another anecdote, dozen or more years ago a friend had a fault cable modem that was spitting out radio traffic I assume on some important frequencies in a dense area. They got a knock on the door from an FCC team who were tracking the interference down.
minimaltom
|previous
[-]
fluxflexer
|root
|parent
[-]
Handy to garrot werewolves too