Hacker News
Germany Sets New Six-Month Startup Record
nottorp
|next
[-]
CodesInChaos
|root
|parent
[-]
egorfine
|root
|parent
|next
[-]
CodesInChaos
|root
|parent
[-]
* Employee share options are taxed when they sell the shares, not when issuing the option (regardless of strike price) nor when exercising it.
* Changes to the shareholder structure (e.g. raising capital) don't require visiting a notary
And I'm not sure if incorporating in a different EU country (while still looking just like a German EU Inc) would avoid some of the German pain points.
jstrebel
|next
|previous
[-]
ant6n
|next
|previous
[-]
Beijinger
|root
|parent
[-]
ant6n
|root
|parent
|next
[-]
In Germany, innovation is defined and funded by grant agencies. The only projects that are deemed innovative are those that look like existing projects that are known to be innovative.
superze
|root
|parent
|next
|previous
[-]
throw1234567891
|root
|parent
|previous
[-]
Beijinger
|root
|parent
[-]
Not the sharpest minds. More bureaucratic than entrepreneurial. At the time, none of the C-suite had ever run their own company. Zero international experience. Complete mediocrity.
alexbelyanin
|previous
[-]
That might also explain part of the discrepancy in this thread: a count like this only captures what registers as a "startup" in the first place. If AI is mostly lowering the cost of getting to a working, revenue-generating product solo, a meaningful chunk of that activity may never show up in a founder database – it just looks like someone quietly running a small profitable thing.
Curious whether anyone here started something in Germany this year without going near a grant or VC process – and if so, whether that was deliberate or just never came up.