Hacker News
George Lucas Returns to Earth, Bearing Gifts
slg
|next
[-]
It's such a bizarre and idiosyncratic collection that the museum itself inspires as much thought as the art in it.
hamdingers
|root
|parent
|next
[-]
Give me his unrestrained vision. Put it in my veins.
grehbies
|root
|parent
|previous
[-]
EDIT: Get it? For the Museum of Narrative Art?
In all seriousness, I think I would have preferred the [Renaissance masterpiece] -> [Pop culture artifact] progression to have been a surprise. People seem to be more and more focused on expressing their own exuberance and less on preserving for everyone else the experience they put so much stock into. It's a bit selfish and hypocritical.
I knew who Luke's father was years before I saw Empire, and I can only imagine what a shock that must have been to people who didn't. I can only imagine. It would have been nice to have known, though.
Triphibian
|next
|previous
[-]
mungoman2
|next
|previous
[-]
Karliss
|root
|parent
[-]
The shelves can't be very high to keep them easily accessible, adding additional levels solves that. Open central area with higher ceiling gives more natural lighting.
tanseydavid
|next
|previous
[-]
Hilda's sadly closed for good in the past year or so.
msisk6
|root
|parent
|next
[-]
assimpleaspossi
|root
|parent
|next
|previous
[-]
Animats
|previous
[-]
YesBox
|root
|parent
|next
[-]
From what I've read, George Lucas funded 100% of the project, and the Presidio trust rejected it. Then he tried building the museum in Chicago, but he was sued and blocked for a couple years and eventually gave up. Finally he found a spot in LA. IIRC the project took 12 years. The same source mentioned SF hasn't started any major museum projects since 2016.
America is falling behind on public works. We used to have the largest aquarium in the world, and now we're sitting at #5 or #6.
So I am genuinely curious why you and others are opponents of public works projects? I honestly do not understand.
garbawarb
|root
|parent
|next
|previous
[-]
WillPostForFood
|root
|parent
|next
|previous
[-]
tomjakubowski
|root
|parent
|next
|previous
[-]
fullshark
|root
|parent
|previous
[-]
sanex
|root
|parent
[-]
assimpleaspossi
|root
|parent
[-]
joezydeco
|root
|parent
|next
[-]
That means sometimes these kinds of developments don't happen and you can argue either way. Lucas got a little pushy about how he wanted the museum to be developed and also turned down alternate sites. So he took his ball and left and that's okay too.
hamdingers
|root
|parent
|previous
[-]
stockresearcher
|root
|parent
|next
[-]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_Central_Railroad_Co._...
Note that the museum was planned to be built on the actual land that was the subject of that Supreme Court case ;)
hamdingers
|root
|parent
|previous
[-]
Nope. None of the frivolous NIMBY lawsuits ever made it to trial, nor was the museum ever a defendant in any of them (it was the city being sued for approving it). I don't see what you gain from misrepresenting this years after the fact.
The city could've gone to trial for the one case you're referencing, and would've won given enough money and time, but by that point the museum had already started investigating other locations.