Hacker News
Do or do not. There is no backlog
skissane
|next
[-]
Just because you have coding agents, doesn't mean suddenly every such idea should be done immediately. You can come up with a hundred ideas much faster than you can review the work of a hundred agents tasked with implementing them.
bradknowles
|next
|previous
[-]
I don’t always work on stuff in that order, however. And a single PR might fix multiple TODOs.
habitue
|next
|previous
[-]
But unbounded backlog is dumb. Obviously some things will just never be done and it's better to be honest and drop them rather than just let the backlog grow forever.
The usual bottleneck is that you don't know which tickets in the backlog are higher or lower priority. You have to look and prioritize the backlog and... prioritizing tickets that aren't important enough to work on now is the definition of fluffy bs things to spend time on.
So in practice, the backlog gets "prioritized" by being ignored. If something is important, it'll come up again and reality will force you to do it, not the issue sitting unlooked at in linear
rcxdude
|root
|parent
[-]
perrygeo
|previous
[-]
The core concept of a backlog is that some half-assed idea will sit in storage for years... then somehow sprout into a viable software project. Without any research, effort, investment, or design intent.
This is empirically false, especially in the age of LLMs. Intent is everything.